A few days ago I picked up a book by M. Scott Peck entitled
The Different Drummer; I was familiar with his acclaimed effort
The Road Not Taken and thought it would be a good read. I was wrong. Most of it was dry and ineffectual but there is a section in the middle that for me, explains a lot. I'm going to try and share it below, but if you can, find a copy of the book and read p. 188-196. Note: All quotes belong to the author.
According to Peck, there are four stages of spirituality that a person travels through. They are:
STAGE 1: Chaotic, antisocial- "Most all young children and perhaps one in five adults fall into Stage 1. It is essentially a stage of undeveloped spirituality. I call it antisocial because those adults who are in it seem generally incapable of loving others... I call the stage chaotic because these people are basically unprincipled. Being unprincipled, there is nothing that governs them except their own will...there is a lack of integrity to their being."
Hello, first period.STAGE 2: Formal, institutional- This "is the stage of the majority of churchgoers and believers. One is their attachment to the forms (as opposed to the essence) of their religion...it is no wonder that people at this stage of their spiritual development become so threatened when someone seems to be playing footloose and fancy-free with the rules."
STAGE 3: Skeptic, individual- "people in Stage III are generally more spiritually developed than many content to remain in Stage II. Although individualistic, they are not the least bit antisocial...They make up their own minds about things...They make loving, intensely dedicated parents...active truth seekers."
Hello, older sister.STAGE 4: Mystical, communal- these individuals see the "underlying connectedness between things: between men and women, between us and the other creatures and even inanimate matter as well, a fitting together according to an ordinarily invisible fabric underlying the cosmos.
I like to think that I am at stage IV, if only because I feel like I've passed through the skeptical phase and see the essence of my faith, instead of the forms. In other words, I don't believe in God because my parents told me to.
Peck goes on to mention that it is impossible to help people if you are two stages above them. What this means, in theory, is that the best teacher for my first period class (Stage One) would be a strong Stage Two. You know the kind- the basketball coach who demands complete silence and doesn't take any crap. Now that I think about it, most of the teachers I had growing up were Stage Two. The only ones that truly helped me in my journey were Stage Threes and Fours, of which there weren't many. So as a Stage Four, I have nothing to offer them. They are unprincipled and unreligious, which means we have nothing in common. With Stage Two people, at least, we share a sense of religion. This is why I have some success with my other classes.
I feel as if this theory is effective because I can easily place anyone I know into one of the four categories. But maybe I'm biased. My question to you is this- does this make sense? If so, where do you think you fall on the scale?