BLOG: Congress Caps Interest Rates on Payday Loans for Military Personnel

banner

2006/09/29

Congress Caps Interest Rates on Payday Loans for Military Personnel

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Apparently Congress has decided that payday loan businesses have been using "predatory" behavior to screw over military personnel. With loans averaging 400 percent annually (with some states allowing higher) people are falling into a financial black hole, one which sucks the money out of their pockets faster than they can make it.

I have four major problems with this legislation.

1) It's anti-capitalism. Although it's a nice gesture, I'm more of a laissez-faire economist. The market generally sorts itself out. There's a reason no one can sell a live chicken for $10,000- the market won't bear it. So the price is lowered until you find a willing buyer. This is true of all things- couches, platform shoes, antique furniture, etc. The price in a free market is what a customer is willing to pay.

If someone wants (or needs) to borrow money, they've obviously decided the "price" is good enough to do it. It might be highway robbery, but the other person doesn't have to help them in the first place.

2) It specifically targets military personnel. I admire the military, but perhaps we should pass legislation that will benefit all who use the payday loans, just not the men and women in uniform. Then again, I suppose it's okay if they use "predatory" lending practices on the guy who wanted to join the army but has a heart condition. Sheesh.

3) It fails to take into account what will happen as a result of this legislation. Either (a) payday loans will either stop giving military personnel loans- no one says they have to, or (b) they'll offset the loss in profits by ramping up the interest rates on non-military personnel. Or get one of their bazillion lawyers to find a way to tack on more "late fees" for both parties until the numbers add up. It's band-aid legislation passed around election time, meant to look good but do nothing particularly helpful.

4) Lastly, it fails to look into the reason the problem exists. Perhaps there's a reason that military personnel are forced to use payday loans? Perhaps they're not paid enough? Perhaps those who defend our right to do anything we please should make enough money where they don't have to hunt out the vultures of the lending world?

I'm sorry, that's logical and makes sense. Surely Congress would never understand.

So, instead of empowering them to direct their financial lives, we've only managed to slightly dull the moneylender's blade when he comes to take his pound of flesh. He still gets a ragged and bloody ounce, though, and the wound still bleeds just as much. However, thanks to #1 above, Congress won't raise wages until people come to the conclusion that the current salary isn't worth it, and move on. I can't imagine this story is really helping with military recruitment. Eventually, the numbers of those enlisting will force the issue to change.

1 Comments:

Blogger Fish said...

I'm sure there are lawyers and judges and even laymen out there that really understand the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. People that have studied the arguments, discussions and papers written by the Founding Fathers during the decision process so they know not only the words but the intents. If we had such a group review all the legislation passed in the last hundred years, I'd be willing to bet at least 90% would not pass muster. The last 30-40 years seems to be an exercise in "feel good" legislation.

Congressmen and Presidents like to brag about how the "did something" about a problem by passing a particular bill. If the legislation they pass is unconstitutional then it should never be on the books to begin. And if the legislation does not solve the problem (which most don't) it should be stricken from the books. There's never a review though. Bad legislation just stays, costing more each year and often agravates the problem it was initiated to solve.

All we have to do is look at the billions we've spent on "the war on drugs" to see bad legislation. It not only has NOT solved the drug problem, it has become destructive in so many ways (besides the cost to taxpayers).

It's like passing a law to round pi off to 3 because the 3.1416---- is too difficult for students to deal with. They can pass the law but it won't change reality.

Somehow they never seem to connect the dots. Either that or worse yet they KNOW it's not going to make a difference, but pass it anyway so they can brag to their ignorant constituents about how they've sponsored such and such bill just to get re-election votes.

6:56 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Hit Counter
Counters