Alphabet Soup
The following is a footnote from one of my law school prep books. See how many times you have to read it before it starts to make sense. If you understand it clearly on the first try, I proudly proclaim you a genius.
"The reasoning may take this form: A falls more appropriately in B than in C. It does so because A is more like D which is of B than it is like E which is of C. Since A is in B and B is in G (legal concept), then A is in G. But perhaps C is in G also. If so, then B is a decisively different segment of G, because B is like H which is in G and has a different result from C."
"The reasoning may take this form: A falls more appropriately in B than in C. It does so because A is more like D which is of B than it is like E which is of C. Since A is in B and B is in G (legal concept), then A is in G. But perhaps C is in G also. If so, then B is a decisively different segment of G, because B is like H which is in G and has a different result from C."
1 Comments:
Is that from the Levi book on Legal Reasoning?
Post a Comment
<< Home